(no subject)
Mar. 5th, 2002 01:47 pmI now have a desktop computer at work.
Unfortunately, I've discovered that a refresh rate of 85Hz on the monitor maks a big difference for me. I was getting headaches when I had the monitor at 75Hz.
And the monitor/video card in this computer won't do 85Hz at more than 1168x864 resolution, which gives me fewer pixels than the laptop did.
Fooey.
Unfortunately, I've discovered that a refresh rate of 85Hz on the monitor maks a big difference for me. I was getting headaches when I had the monitor at 75Hz.
And the monitor/video card in this computer won't do 85Hz at more than 1168x864 resolution, which gives me fewer pixels than the laptop did.
Fooey.
no subject
Date: 2002-03-05 12:14 pm (UTC)Of course, I've gone looking for this before and haven't been able to find it, so it may just be a product of my fevered imagination. I read this back when "serious" computers (e.g. workstations) still used B&W or greyscale.
no subject
Date: 2002-03-05 12:20 pm (UTC)I'm at 1152x864 and 100 Hz -- a lower refresh rate gives me a headache. Since my vision isn't so great I don't mind this resolution on a 21" monitor, though you probably perceive that as big chunky pixels. :-) (I just checked, and my graphics card seems prepared to offer me 1280x1024 at 100 Hz. But that resolution results in things that are too small for me to see.)
I assume that your employer isn't going to buy you a large LCD monitor, thus eliminating flicker issues, any time soon. :-)
no subject
Date: 2002-03-05 06:50 pm (UTC)I wonder if cranking down the image size on the screen would be any good.