Last Thursday's D&D game went a bit better, IMHO.
I did manage to at least start out with some description (though I lost it quickly as we went into combat). This helped set the mood a bit, and I noticed that people were speaking in character much more than usual.
The combat itself was pretty fun. The barbarian bugbear managed to impress them with how much damage it was able to soak up. They still ended up taking almost no damage that they couldn't heal the next day, but at least they got scratched. (Note to self: if having only one encounter per game day, the EL needs to be a couple of levels above the party to be interesting.)
Unfortunately, I don't seem yet to have created an atmosphere of urgency. In particular, the party is currently going through a prolonged and tedious process of figuring out how to transport their mounts across the shattered bridge, despite the fact that they've concluded that the Duke they're trying to rescue is in trouble.
I guess I'll try to remind them of the urgency when they recap next, and warn them that this may not be a prudent use of their time. And if they don't make it in time... well, it seems like a waste of a good duke, but I'd do it to make a point.
I did manage to at least start out with some description (though I lost it quickly as we went into combat). This helped set the mood a bit, and I noticed that people were speaking in character much more than usual.
The combat itself was pretty fun. The barbarian bugbear managed to impress them with how much damage it was able to soak up. They still ended up taking almost no damage that they couldn't heal the next day, but at least they got scratched. (Note to self: if having only one encounter per game day, the EL needs to be a couple of levels above the party to be interesting.)
Unfortunately, I don't seem yet to have created an atmosphere of urgency. In particular, the party is currently going through a prolonged and tedious process of figuring out how to transport their mounts across the shattered bridge, despite the fact that they've concluded that the Duke they're trying to rescue is in trouble.
I guess I'll try to remind them of the urgency when they recap next, and warn them that this may not be a prudent use of their time. And if they don't make it in time... well, it seems like a waste of a good duke, but I'd do it to make a point.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-15 08:24 pm (UTC)On the other hand, it might be worth letting it go--5+ Reduces, an Alter Self and 3-5 Sleeps seems like a lot of spells to burn on travelling--the arcane spellcasters are going to be pretty out of it for the rest of the day. It's also not guaranteed to work--Reduce and Sleep both allow saves, and getting the horses to waive them (especially Reduce's) could be tricky. You really don't want the druid standing next to the horse to calm it when you cast Sleep on its area. :)
Is the count of animals to be ferried (5) including the druid's companion? He'll probably need a Reduce as well, but likely not a Sleep.
Hmm. Having the horse wake up in midferry due to jolting would be kinda bad--better not encounter any air turbulence. :)
no subject
Date: 2002-07-15 08:38 pm (UTC)I had forgotten about the saving throws against Reduce. That may be a big challenge for their silly idea. Thank you.
The count of animals does not include the druid's wolf, nor the halfling's riding dog. Those can probably climb, more or less.
Re: air turbulence--that's just one of the many ways things could go wrong. I'm still struck by the idea of two people of normal strength carrying a horse weighing 150 pounds or so, while flying. It seems like a recipe for trouble.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-15 08:50 pm (UTC)Assuming someone with high enough Use Rope skill, you could probably contrive a horse-harness so that the fliers don't have to try to hold on to the horse.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-15 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 11:14 am (UTC)Do sleeping creatures get saving throws? (They certainly shouldn't get will saves, but I assume the save against Reduce is fortitude.)
BTW, if we actually do this, I had already planned to suggest that the flight path more-or-less follow the terrain. The consequences of dropping the load would be lowered that way. (We were also going to have Kyle come up with something harness-like using rope, as I recall.)
[In character:] Of course, that's assuming that Prolix can keep up. I have been practicing flight for the last several weeks, including basic maneuvers. He, however, has been partying with wizards. Hrolf says Prolix is clumsy and we should just cause the horses to sprout wings...
no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 11:41 am (UTC)Why shouldn't sleeping creatures get will saves? I can see them getting a penalty, maybe, but otherwise it makes certain classes of spells much, much more powerful. (The evil wizard has prepared one Still Silent Dominate Person for each member of the group. He hides in the bushes near where you make camp. During each watch, he Dominates the people who are sleeping. He is automatically successful, so even if they wake up he just puts them back to sleep.)
Then, there's the example of the Nightmare spell, which allows a will save and can _only_ be cast while the target is sleeping. :)
no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 11:52 am (UTC)I haven't actually read up on all the spells of higher level than my character can know. One of these days I should just sit down and read the spell descriptions cover to cover.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 01:09 pm (UTC)I have some hesitations as to whether this will actually work due to things like Kyle's skill level and rope strength. Kyle also has some hesitations as to whether he wants to participate in such a plan. Sprouting wings is kind of freaky although not quite a shapechange. That also means that he'd have to trust Prolix to not drop him or his mount. He'd probably trust Larissa to at least not do it on purpose unless she found out about what he last read in her diary. :)
no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 01:45 pm (UTC)It sounds from Ralph's comments that this won't actually need to get implemented, though. We'll see.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-16 02:03 pm (UTC)